2015年4月7日 星期二

Fugitive businessman Jho Low, accused of buying with stolen money from a multibillion-dollar heist


Fugitive businessman Jho Low, accused of orchestrating a multibillion-dollar fraud of a Malaysian sovereign wealth fund, has agreed to forfeit over $100 million worth of luxury real estate as part of a wide-ranging settlement with U.S. prosecutors.

That includes two posh London apartments, two New York City condos—one on the city’s famed Billionaire’s Row—and a contemporary mansion in Los Angeles, all of which U.S. prosecutors accused Mr. Low of buying with stolen money from a multibillion-dollar heist, known as the 1MDB scandal, the U.S. Department of Justice announced on Wednesday.

The collection of lavish properties are only a slice of some $700 million in assets, including a private jet, fine art and diamond jewelry, that Mr. Low has agreed to give up, according to court documents filed this week.

Mr. Low, 37, has denied all charges against him. He said in a statement that the settlement did “not constitute an admission of guilt, liability or any form of wrongdoing by me.”

The three U.S. homes were already headed to the market as part of prior agreements between Mr. Low and federal prosecutors, Mansion Global has previously reported

One of them, a lavish penthouse atop the Mandarin Oriental Residences by Central Park South, a stretch of Midtown Manhattan referred to as Billionaire’s Row for its superlatively expensive apartments, is already in contract, according to listing records on StreetEasy. 

The three U.S. homes were already headed to the market as part of prior agreements between Mr. Low and federal prosecutors, Mansion Global has previously reported

One of them, a lavish penthouse atop the Mandarin Oriental Residences by Central Park South, a stretch of Midtown Manhattan referred to as Billionaire’s Row for its superlatively expensive apartments, is already in contract, according to listing records on StreetEasy. 

A forfeited four-bedroom Manhattan penthouse of fugitive financier Jho Low is already in contract with a buyerThe four-bedroom penthouse went into contract earlier this month, asking $30 million—approximately $500,000 less than Mr. Low bought it for in 2011.

Agents for Mr. Low are expected to help the U.S. government manage and dispose of the assets, including his five homes, the Justice Department said.

But the intermediaries are likely to face an uphill task selling off the properties for figures close to what Mr. Low originally paid, as both New York City and London are in the midst of a downturn in their prime housing markets.
  
For example, Mr. Low’s other New York City property is located on the second floor of a historic pre-war building in Manhattan’s trendy SoHo neighborhood. The apartment, which features 14-foot ceilings, decorative interior columns and built-in bookshelves, is asking $9.2 million—several million less than the $13.8 million Mr. Low purchased it for back in 2014, according to a listing for the property and court documents.

A historic SoHo apartment Mr. Low purchased for $13.8 million in 2014 is now listed for $9.2 million.It’s not just a change in market conditions that presents a hurdle for those charged with unloading the properties, as some have fallen into disrepair.

For instance, the sprawling Los Angeles mansion, set on 1.2 acres off the city’s Sunset Strip, “will need full restoration,” according to a listing for the property with Ernie Carswell and Christopher Pickett, both of Douglas Elliman. The brokerage has declined to comment on the property.
The Los Angeles house, which prosecutors said Mr. Low purchased with embezzled funds, is on the market for $24 million—less than two-thirds of the $39 million the businessman paid in 2012, according to property records and court documents.

Meanwhile, the sale of Mr. Low’s London properties face a similarly daunting market, as higher transfer taxes in the U.K. paired with a rancorous political environment ahead of Brexit have combined to depress home values in the city’s center since 2014. 

It’s not clear how much Mr. Low paid for the two London apartments, which include a 12,000-square-foot penthouse and a nearby flat, both in the city’s posh Mayfair neighborhood. Federal prosecutors claim he wired at least £35 million to a U.K. bank account for the purchase of the penthouse atop Stratton House in 2010, according to court documents.

But the developer of the building, Grafton Advisors, claims the lavish aerie set a record nine years ago at over £4,000 per square foot, according to Grafton’s website. That would mean a final sale price at the time of over £48 million. At the moment, there are no publicly listed apartments priced that high in London.

Mr. Low, who is reportedly in self-imposed exile in China, is accused of orchestrating the theft of $4.5 billion from the 1Malaysia Development Berhad, known as 1MDB. U.S. prosecutors maintain that he laundered the ill-gotten gains through banks around the world and used the funds to run a lavish lifestyle.

“Thanks to this settlement, one of the men allegedly at the center of this massive scheme will lose all access to hundreds of millions of dollars,” said U.S. Attorney Nicola T. Hanna of the Central District of California in a statement on Wednesday. “This settlement agreement forces Low and his family to relinquish hundreds of millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains that were intended to be used for the benefit of the Malaysian people, and it sends a signal that the United States will not be a safe haven for the proceeds of corruption.

link:   https://www.mansionglobal.com/articles/


A forfeited four-bedroom Manhattan penthouse of fugitive financier Jho Low is already in contract with a buyer.

A historic SoHo apartment Mr. Low purchased for $13.8 million in 2014 is now listed for $9.2 million.

 

 

三浦祐太朗 - 消えない虹

Parents in legal fight with widow over will

The widow of a high-flying academic has been handed victory in a court battle with her dead husband’s parents over her £430,000 home. 

Kings College London medical statistician, Dr Kun Liu, died aged 31 in 2015, leaving everything to his bride of just three weeks, Xuan Wu.

However, the doctor’s death sparked a bitter legal row between his widow and his Chinese parents, who claim they had ‘ploughed much of their retirement savings into getting him on the property ladder’

The parents of an academic who died from cancer have contested his widow's inheritance because he “promised” they could move in with him.

Dr Kun Liu, a medical statistician at Kings College London, died aged 31 in 2015, leaving everything to his bride, Xuan Wu, having married her in hospital less than a month before his passing.
He signed a will by “marking a cross on a document prepared by a solicitor”, leaving his new wife their £430,000 home in south Croydon, the Central London county court heard.

However, she is now embroiled in a bitter legal dispute with Kun’s Chinese parents, who claim they lent him large amounts of money to purchase the property that would give him “the best opportunity to succeed in life”.

Weidong Liu and Yali Kang claim to have given their son over £325,000 since 2012, but thought he would repay them.
Kun met Xuan Wu, his future bride, when he was studying in Manchester in 2005
Kun met Xuan Wu, his future bride, when he was studying in Manchester in 2005 


They have travelled across the world to put their case against their daughter-in-law who wedded their son in November 2015.

Kun, who had achieved a PhD at Manchester University, even “invited them to retire to the UK and live with him”, claimed Mr Nickless, the parents barrister.

“This money came from their life savings and money borrowed from their family, ” he explained.
“Alternatively, they say they are entitled to repayment of the sum they lent to Kun.”

But Ms Wu, 34, is fighting the legal claim, disputing that the money was ever intended as a loan.

Her barrister, Max Thorowgood, said the young couple became engaged in 2012 “with the consent of their parents”.

“She says the larger payments were gifts made by his parents on account of her engagement to Kun Liu, and that her parents made similar payments,” he argued.

Kun and his future bride met when he was studying in Manchester in 2005 and she alleges they began to live together from that date, eventually becoming engaged in 2012.

However, Kun's parents claim that until 2014 they were unaware of the depth of feeling between their son and his girlfriend.
Picture shows Weidong Liu outside Central London County Court
Picture shows Weidong Liu outside Central London County Court 


His father told the court that he and his son had an “understanding” that Kun should not take up with with a serious girlfriend while studying.

Mr Liu added that him and his wife had spent a lot of money on their son’s academic career, describing him as an “excellent student”.

But in April 2015, the family received the devastating news of his cancer diagnosis, although his parents say they only learnt about his terminal illness the day after the hospital wedding ceremony.
Just over a week later, they flew to the UK to see their son for the last time.
The hearing continues.

They handed over part of their retirement pot because 'it was for the good of their family to enhance his prospects as much as possible', they claimed.
 
And they hoped that one day they might move to the UK after retiring and live with their son in his home.
 
But Xuan Wu said she doubted whether his parents would ever have come to the UK - or even obtained a visa.
 
Dr Liu’s parents jetted to the UK to give evidence in support of their case – but their claim was rejected by Judge Parfitt after a five-day hearing
 
The widow had told the judge Dr Liu’s parents ‘exaggerated the amount of money provided by them’, and that her own parents also contributed about half the cash.
 
The judge accepted that Dr Liu, as a ‘dutiful son’, might well have thought that his parents would eventually retire to England.

But such retirement plans were separate from the house-buying project, he found, and there was no fixed intention that he should repay the cash from his parents and they ‘were ultimately excluded’ in his will, the judge ruled.

‘This is harsh for them, but of itself suggests that at least by but of itself suggests that at least by the time of the property’s purchase and thereafter, Dr Liu did not regard himself as under any financial obligation to his parents,’ he said.

But Judge Nicholas Parfitt has now handed the wife victory, saying that the academic considered his ‘moral obligation’ was to his young widow, not to his elderly parents.

Central London County Court heard the young couple had swapped marriage vows in hospital on November 27 2015, just three weeks before he died.

Shortly before his death, the frail doctor had made his last will ‘by marking a cross on a document prepared by a solicitor,’ naming his 34-year-old widow as his sole heir.

However his parents, Weidong Liu and Kali Kang, later challenged their dead son’s move and claimed the house the widow had inherited belonged to them in reality.

But Judge Nicholas Parfitt has now handed the wife victory, saying that the academic considered his ‘moral obligation’ was to his young widow, not to his elderly parents.


link : https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/07/young-widow-wins-court-battle-laws-stay-marital-home-8857151/
 
 
 

10 things you might not know about geniuses

 
Oct 23, 2015 9:00 AM
Why was Albert Einstein so brilliant? He had a superhighway running through the center of his noggin.
Why was Albert Einstein so brilliant? He had a superhighway running through the center of his noggin. (Associated Press)


The Chicago-based MacArthur Foundation recently came out with this year's "genius grants." There's a new movie about another genius, Steve Jobs. It's time for you to get smart, unless you already know these 10 facts about geniuses:
1. "Genius" is a vague, debatable term. But in the 1920s, Stanford professor Edward Terman used IQ scores to select more than 1,000 children as subjects in his Genetic Study of Genius. The participants — nicknamed "Termites" — have generally remained unidentified.

But among them were Edward Dmytryk, who directed the film "The Caine Mutiny," and Norris Bradbury, who ran the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Two children whose IQ scores didn't meet Terman's standards were William Shockley and Luis Alvarez. Those rejects grew up to win the Nobel Prize in Physics.


2. Shortly after Albert Einstein died on April 18, 1955, his brain was sliced and diced and photographed in an effort to see what made him so darn smart. But it wasn't until 2010 that newly rediscovered photos and advances in brain research offered some answers to that question. Certain sections of Einstein's brain were more developed, and it had more wrinkles and loops and ridges — which is good in a brain — but the key may have been his huge corpus callosum, the dense network of nerve fibers that connects the different areas of the brain.
Einstein, as it turns out, had a superhighway running through the center of his noggin, likely explaining his astonishing creativity and genius.
 
3. Vivien Thomas, a 19-year-old black man in Nashville, Tenn., found his hopes of going to college dashed by the Depression in 1930. So he took a job as a lab assistant to white surgeon Alfred Blalock of Vanderbilt University. Despite Thomas' lack of higher education, he became a brilliant surgical technician and research partner who helped Blalock develop pioneering methods of treating shock and operating on the heart.
Yet for years Thomas was classified as a janitor and paid at that level when he was doing the equivalent of postgraduate work. Thomas even worked as a bartender at Blalock's parties to earn extra money. Ultimately, Thomas' vital role in the medical breakthroughs was widely recognized, and he received an honorary doctorate from Johns Hopkins in 1976.


4. Eureka moments are strokes of genius that have produced a number of scientific breakthroughs, including Alexander Fleming's discovery of penicillin and Philo Farnsworth's invention of the television. When Swiss inventor George de Mestral pulled burrs from his dog in 1941, his aha moment not only eventually gave the world Velcro, but also one of the first examples of biomimetics, or biological mimicry.
 
5. When Polish physicist and chemist Marie Sklodowska married Frenchman Pierre Curie and became "Madame Curie," she handled the grocery shopping and cooking with scientific precision. But the woman who would win two Nobel Prizes was confused by a recipe and had to ask her sister a difficult question: What exactly is a "pinch"?
 
Marie Curie, center, is seen with her two daughters, Irene and Eve, in this undated photograph. The physicist and chemist known as "Madame Curie" won two Nobel Prizes but reportedly didn't understand a common kitchen measurement.
Marie Curie, center, is seen with her two daughters, Irene and Eve, in this undated photograph. The physicist and chemist known as "Madame Curie" won two Nobel Prizes but reportedly didn't understand a common kitchen measurement. (Chicago Tribune)

6. Hedy Kiesler Markey received a patent in 1942 for her work with George Antheil to develop a frequency-hopping technique allowing radio-controlled torpedoes to avoid detection and jamming. The technological advance had major implications beyond World War II, fostering development of wireless communications. Markey was brilliant in another field as well, performing in movies under the name Hedy Lamarr.
 
7. It seemed like a great idea: a Nobel Prize sperm bank. But the 1980 brainchild of Robert K. Graham, who made millions off shatterproof plastic eyeglasses, quickly ran into trouble when he announced that the first Nobelist to donate was none other than William Shockley, an inventor of the transistor and also a notorious racist who promoted voluntary sterilization for less-intelligent people.
 
Though it survived until 1999 and produced 215 babies, the Repository for Germinal Choice, as the bank was officially known, couldn't shed the taint it was a Nazi-like scheme to create a master race. It also never persuaded more than a few Nobelists to donate. The bank's operations couldn't have instilled great confidence either. The catalog used colors to mask donor identities but was rife with misspellings. How could a prospective mother envision her own baby Einstein coming from a donor named Corral, Turquois and Fucshia?

8. Hungarian physician Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis had a controversial medical theory that many of his fellow doctors refused to accept. Frustrated, Semmelweis lashed out publicly and was fired from his job. Ultimately, he was committed to a mental asylum, where the guards reportedly beat him and he died in 1865. Semmelweis' unpopular brainstorm: that doctors should wash their hands before treating patients.
 
9. If you find yourself a bit bored at your next meeting of Mensa International, the club for people with IQs in the highest 2 percent, maybe it's time to apply to the Top One Percent Society or even the Triple Nine Society, representing the 99.9th percentile. If that proves less than stimulating, you may be ready for the Prometheus Society, which restricts membership to the 99.997th percentile and up, or the Mega Society, for those with an IQ of 176 or more, the top 99.9999th percentile of the population. Then again, being a genius, you know there are serious doubts about the accuracy of tests trying to measure IQs above 140.
 
10. Physicist Tsung-Dao Lee has wrestled with such complex issues as parity violation and nontopological solitons, but when the Columbia University professor shared the 1957 Nobel Prize, his favorite Chinese restaurant in New York put up a sign with a simple explanation for his triumph: "Eat here, win Nobel Prize."



A married couple were killed in a light aircraft crash in a Scottish hillside


A married couple were killed in a light aircraft crash as they made a surprise visit to see family during the holiday weekend.

David and Margaret-Ann Rous were on an Easter getaway when their private plane crashed into hills during bad weather in the Scottish highlands.

The pair had arranged a secret visit using Mr Rous’s light aircraft to see his wife’s mother and sister on an island in the Inner Hebrides on Saturday.

Newlyweds: Dr Margaret-Ann and David Rous died when their light aircraft crashed into a Scottish hillside while flying from their home in Dundee to make a surprise to see family on the the Hebridean isle of Tiree
Dr Margaret-Ann Rous on her wedding day
David and Dr Margaret-Ann Rous on their wedding day
But when the couple failed to turn up at the island’s airstrip and radar contact could not be made with the plane, a search party was scrambled.

The wreckage of the plane and the couple’s bodies were found in hills in Argyll six hours later as aviation experts said the flight may have encountered poor visibility.

Shocked residents on the island of Tiree paid tribute to the ‘wonderful’ Dr Rous, 37, who had been married to the 28-year-old structural engineer for three years.

The couple lived in a £260,000 semi-detached house in Newport-on-Tay, just across the river from Dundee where Dr Rous worked as a family doctor.


Neighbours said that despite Mr Rous often working away from home, the couple frequently held parties for them to make friends.

Dr John Holliday, Tiree’s local doctor for almost 30 years, said: ‘I had known Margaret-Ann since the 1980s. She captivated everyone that knew her. She was absolutely gorgeous in every way. She became a much-loved GP in Dundee and I have no doubt that she was a wonderful doctor with her charm and great empathy.

Surprise visit to see family: The couple were flying in Mr Rous's Piper Cherokee from Dundee, where they lived, to Tiree, where Dr Rous grew up, to spend the weekend with her mother and sister
Surprise visit to see family: The couple were flying in Mr Rous's Piper Cherokee from Dundee, where they lived, to Tiree, where Dr Rous grew up, to spend the weekend with her mother and sister

‘She immediately touched the hearts of everyone who came into contact with her.’

Paying tribute to Mr Rous, originally from Gillingham in Kent, he added: ‘He was a really nice man and a very talented structural engineer with a bright professional career ahead of him.

‘Together they made a fine couple. We can only imagine what the family must be suffering.

‘A cloud has fallen over Tiree, but the island community will come together as it always does at times like this.’

Private jet: The couple were flying in a Piper Cherokee light aircraft (like the one above) when tragedy struck
Private jet: The couple were flying in a Piper Cherokee light aircraft (like the one above) when tragedy struck

The tragedy unfolded after the couple set off from Dundee Airport in Mr Rous’s single-engine Piper Cherokee plane on Saturday.

 Radar contact was lost at around 1.50pm as they travelled over the remote Beinn nan Lus area of Glen Kinglass.

Coastguard and Royal Navy helicopters, as well as an air ambulance, were called, and found the wreckage at 8pm on the northern side of Glen Kinglass, above Loch Etive.

The Air Accidents Investigation Branch is now examining possible causes of the crash.

Local aviation expert David Howitt said that the conditions were poor at the time, adding: ‘I have been taking weather readings here for 50 years, and on Saturday the weather was very, very dubious. There was some very poor visibility.’

Source: the Mail